The Tumult Between the Storms

Weimar: Life on the Edge of Catastrophe by Katja Hoyer (Basic Books, 2026)

Reviewed by William Skiles

 

One great challenge of writing a history of the downfall of the Weimar Republic is avoiding the appearance of a democracy doomed at the outset by the economic and political tumult of the time and the subsequent electoral growth of the Nazis in the late 1920s and early 1930s. We have a tendency to read this history in hindsight, as if the Weimar Republic was fated to collapse under the weight of the challenges of the post-World War I years.

In Katja Hoyer’s engrossing Weimar: Life on the Edge of Catastrophe, she meets the challenge by focusing on the town of Weimar, the newly made capital of the post-war republic, and yet also the long-standing cultural heart of Germany, the home of Goethe and Schiller, and the epicenter of the emerging and revolutionary Bauhaus movement. Hoyer’s narrative interweaves the history of the German state with the ebbs and flows of the everyday lives of Weimarers. She uses the central German town of Weimar as a lens through which to understand the slow decline of the republic.

Hoyer’s Weimar combines the storyteller’s eye for narrative drama and the scholar’s eye for historical detail and nuance. She is a German-born historian and journalist working in Great Britain, and she has become one of the prominent voices in the English-speaking world on the history of modern Germany. She is the co-host of the aptly named Reichs & Republics, a podcast on modern German history. She is also author of Blood and Iron, a history of the German Empire of 1871, and Beyond the Wall, a history of East Germany in the Cold War.

Weimar begins with the end of the armistice of World War I and the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. She continues, year by year through the establishment of Weimar democracy, through its political and economic turmoil, the emergence of the Nazi Party in Bavaria in the late 1920s, to the rise of Nazi power in 1933, and through to the start of the Second World War with Hitler's invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939. The book is in many ways a chronology, a year-by-year overview of the events in Weimar and the changes in the lives of Weimarers.

One of Hoyer’s fundamental points in the book is that Weimar was one of the few places in Germany where the townspeople could actually see Nazi policies and aims at work before the Nazi rise to power in January 1933. As a result of the Nazi turnout in the elections of December 1929, the Nazi leader Wilhelm Frick was appointed Minister of the Interior and Education in Thuringia, the capital of which was Weimar. Under his leadership, schools in Thuringia introduced Nazi racial ideology. Just two years later, in 1932, Fritz Sauckel became the Minister-President of Thuringia, and he sought to advance Nazi interests in the state and in Weimar in particular. In this time, the Nazi influence upon social and cultural institutions proceeded apace, yet met significant public protests.

In this context, Hoyer writes, individual Weimarers had decisions to make that would reverberate into the Nazi period. Her aim is to “examine the impact and also the futility of personal decisions made in the face of seismic historic forces” (xxiv). Thus, we are introduced to a cast of characters, and we learn their stories, how their lives took twists and turns amid the challenges of the day.

We meet Arthur and Rosa Schmidt, struggling owners of the Hotel Hohenzollern. As National Socialism is on the rise in Thuringia, local Nazis used the hotel as an organizational office, even using their hotel’s facilities for party events. As the economy improved in the late 1920s, the hotel began to flourish. Yet the Schmidts had an increasingly troubling secret. Rosa had Jewish ancestry and had to hide in plain sight, growing more apprehensive as the Nazis came to power in 1933.

We also meet the middle-class shop owner Carl Weirich and his family. He loved books and paper and was a bookbinder, as was his father. He came from Eisenach and made his home in Weimar in 1914, hoping to recreate his family’s bookbinding success in the cultural capital of Germany. The Nazi economic policies and development in Weimar gave a boost to Carl’s business, and he grew to support Hitler and the new regime. Yet he would grow disenchanted as the costs of the Third Reich weighed upon him and his family.

Perhaps the most well-known Weimarer in Hoyer’s story is Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche, the sister of Friedrich Nietzsche and the heir of his literary estate. Hoyer colorfully depicts how Elisabeth struggled to find sufficient patronage for the newly established Nietzsche Archive in Weimar, that is, until the Nazis came to power and she sidled up to National Socialist ideology for the short-term benefit of her brother’s legacy.

Hoyer presents for the reader the lives of ordinary people in Weimar, and even some extraordinary figures who resisted the Nazi regime, such as the socialist and civil servant Kurt Nehrling. As Hoyer describes the increasing popularity and reach of the National Socialist Party, and explores how once the party took power, it institutionalized its racialist and militarist policies. She chronicles the lives of Weimarers in the ordinary and the extraordinary, in the births and the deaths, in the birthdays and anniversaries, in the baptisms and weddings. She reveals men and women living their lives and doing the best they can.

This chronological aspect to her writing is purposeful and very well done. Hoyer explains that her approach is not to judge the people of Weimar and their decisions in the interwar period. She writes, "I have kept my commentary and analysis as a historian to a minimum, allowing you, the reader, to observe events, decisions and developments as they unfold” (xxvi). Her aim is to understand the decisions people made to oppose, support, or acquiesce to the rise of National Socialism.

One might consider this approach a weakness as it relies on description rather than analysis and evaluation. Discerning readers might object that some individual choices of Weimarers as described demand confrontation and judgment, as they enabled or facilitated the rise of the Nazi Party in Thuringia. Yet Hoyer helps readers see themselves in the place and time of her subjects, and this imaginative exercise allows the reader to evaluate and judge for themselves how they would have acted in their shoes.

Hoyer describes vividly the lives of these men, women, and their children through the use of illuminating primary sources, some of which have never before been used by historians. She makes good use of public speeches, government decrees, organizational announcements and chronicles, police reports, Gestapo reports, and newspaper articles. But the stories of Weimarers come really alive from her use of personal letters, the diaries of Harry Graf Kessler, Carl Weirich, and Joseph Goebbels, and the personal recollections of numerous individuals.

Indeed, the diary of Carl Weirich is a particularly important primary source. As Hoyer reports, the Weimar Town Archive has only just acquired the diary and made it available to researchers. Until now, to my knowledge, it has never been used by a historian in telling the history of Weimar in the interwar years. And Hoyer makes the most of this source to tell heartrending Weirich’s story. One hopes the diary can be translated into English and become more widely available.

Hoyer underscores in her history how everyone makes choices, how human beings "are shaped by historical events and in turn shape them with their responses" (418). She argues, "If we are to learn anything from history, we must allow that fact to sink in. The Nazis couldn't take away people's free will, regardless of their exceptionally effective means of propaganda and repression" (418). Hoyer succeeds in demonstrating through the lives of the town of Weimar's citizens that the future was wide open for the people of Germany and that the Nazi course was one of many open to them.

I recommend Hoyer’s Weimar for anyone interested in understanding how one democracy failed and how ordinary citizens made every-day decisions in one of the most tumultuous times in the past century. The result is an exceptional tale of a town, as she says, "on the edge of catastrophe."

 

 


William Skiles is Associate Professor of History and Associate Dean of Academics at Regent University, in Virginia Beach, Virginia. His research focuses on the cultural and religious history of modern Germany.

Next
Next

The importance of criticism in the development of a writer: sharpen your skills, read and write reviews